Press enter to search
Taxation

Tax Fairness Strikes a Chord

A new study shows broad public support for taxing the rich.

Blogging Our Great Divide
March 23, 2015

by Josh Hoxie

You wouldn’t know it by watching our elected representatives in Congress this week, but Americans are embracing tax fairness.

Over 60 percent think corporations and the wealthy aren’t paying their fair share of taxes according to a new report from Pew Research Center.  The study looked at public sentiment on the tax system in advance of Tax Day and in light of the current fiscal battles on Capitol Hill.

While Congress is deeply divided on the issue, both Democrats and Republicans support higher taxes on the wealthy including more than 70 percent of Democrats and 52 percent of Republicans according to the study.

The Pew study is only the most recent example showing rising support for raising taxes on the rich. Americans for Tax Fairness released a compilation of recent studies showing widespread support for a tax fairness agenda. Here are a few highlights:

An Associated Press study in February showed 68 percent think wealthy households pay too little taxes. Only 11 percent thought they paid too much.

Over 60 percent supported the statement, “America’s tax system favors the wealthy over the middle class and poor” according to a January study by Huffington Post/YouGov.

A November 2014 study by Hart Research that showed 62 percent of Americans support “raising taxes on the wealthy and large corporations to fund priorities like education, job training, and deficit reduction. “

So is Congress listening to the will of the people? Unfortunately, no.

The House Ways and Means Committee held a hearing calling for the elimination of the estate tax, a tax that exclusively targets the wealthiest .18 percent of households. They’re planning to hold a vote on repeal this week.

The Budget Committees in both chambers of Congress held mark-ups of budget resolutions that would gut popular programs and do nothing to address tax fairness. These draconian spending plans have no real chance of becoming law as they’d require either 60 votes in the Senate or the President’s signature, neither of which are happening.

If they did, as Paul Krugman points out, it would represent a “huge transfer in income from the poor and the working class, who would see severe benefit cuts, to the rich, who would see big tax cuts.” Krugman goes on to remind us, in case you forgot, “you should be very, very angry.”

Josh Hoxie tracks the debate over the estate tax and other grand divide-related concerns for the Institute for Policy Studies Program on Inequality and the Common Good.

Topics
Taxation,
Explore More

Inequality

Enriching CEOs, Endangering Patients

March 26, 2015

by Sam Pizzigati

Inherited Wealth

Using the Family Farm to Help the Rich

March 20, 2015

by Chuck Collins

Stay informed

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter
Please leave this field empty