Making the market “decisive” means that the Chinese government has decided to place profits before people — and even before that previously invincible talisman, economic growth.
Fox News may have failed to have an impact on the outcome of the 2012 Presidential election in the United States, but media organizations controlled by Rupert Murdoch celebrated a victory this year in Australia.
Call their bluff. Take the plunge. Go over the cliff. Let the government default on its bonds.
It was the perfect “natural experiment:” in April 1992, New Jersey’s minimum-wage was scheduled to rise from $4.25 an hour to $5.05, while neighboring Pennsylvania’s minimum wage remained unchanged.
Call it vote-buying if you want, but when a government effectively buys the votes of 80 or 90 percent of the population, I call that government of the people, by the people, for the people.
How can things be so much worse now when the economy is essentially in the same place it was five or six years ago? The answer in two words is: Rising inequality.
Median household income fell more than 6% in the last decade, yet national income per household grew 6%. Where did all that money go?
Would it be such a terrible thing if fast food workers got a twenty percent raise this year while executives took a pay cut? It’s not our economy that needs rethinking; it’s our ethics.
The US economy has been growing since July 2009. So why aren’t things improving in the US realonomy?