A weekly newsletter from the Institute for Policy Studies |
|
|
Who’s bankrolling the climate change disinformation that’s stalling the action we need to save our planet? Our just-released report — Fossil Fuel Philanthropy, a collaboration with the Climate Accountability and Research Project — shines a light on the big-money donors blasting cash into the hands of climate deniers. The total amount spent on climate disinformation? That could range anywhere from a few hundred million dollars into the billions. Lax reporting standards make more accurate estimates impossible.
These hundreds of millions are underwriting well over 130 shadowy groups, including many of the disinformation actors tied into the billionaire Charles Koch’s Stand Together network.
Fossil fuel philanthropy epitomizes the egregious inequality between the political influence of our rich and all the rest of us. Moguls and heirs are using capital extracted from exploiting our Earth to shape the world in their own image. But we can stem the bleeding of tax-exempt donations toward destructive causes. Check our report here to see just how.
Two quick housekeeping notes. We're hiring! Inequality.org is looking for a research and editorial associate to help support our team. More info at this link. And please join us tomorrow, September 19 at 7:00 ET, for a virtual event organized by campaign to Stop Private Jet Expansion, featuring Inequality.org’s Chuck Collins. You can sign-up here. Thanks!
Bella DeVaan for the Institute for Policy Studies’ Inequality.org team |
|
|
INEQUALITY BY THE NUMBERS |
|
|
Why We Need To Fight To Make America’s Child Care More Affordable This week’s frontline face: Iletha Joynes, co-coordinator of the media and communications team with United Workers. What she’s doing to help create a more equal world: Joynes had her first personal exposure to the enormous inadequacies of our care-giving world when she had a daughter 14 years ago. She faced an impossible choice: either keep working but still not be able to afford child care or quit to care for her child herself while she struggled to make ends meet.
The national advocacy group Family Values @ Work recently shared the Joynes story at an event that highlighted the many deficits in America’s support systems. A paid-leave program for all Americans, Joynes notes in a new analysis on Inequality.org, would have made her situation infinitely more manageable.
What makes this fight so important: “Having a child should be a joyful event, not a deeply stressful one,” Joynes notes. “I have come to understand my experience as a failure of our elected leaders to provide basic needs like affordable, accessible child care and paid family and medical leave.” |
|
|
Make the Economy Work for All of Us — By Taxing the Rich!
America’s care infrastructure remains grossly underfunded. One simple way to fix that: Fix our rich people-friendly tax code. Raising the minimum corporate tax and closing loopholes that only benefit our wealthiest, as Citizens for Tax Justice executive director Amy Hanauer explains in a new Inequality.org piece, could help fund everything from family leave and affordable child care to caring for our disabled and aging and providing access to decent health care for all the rest of us.
The two candidates competing for the presidency this fall could hardly be farther apart on taxes. Kamala Harris has signaled support for higher taxes on the rich. Donald Trump wants to end the 2017 tax cut for America’s wealthiest that expires at the end of next year.
“Tax justice advocates,” says Hanauer, “should call on both the Harris and Trump campaigns to commit to a fairer tax system — and to use the money it would raise to invest in the child care, elder care, and health care our families need.” |
|
|
Last week’s Trump-Harris debate laid bare many distinct differences between the presidential contenders. We’ve tallied up the number of times each candidate mentioned key terms and positions related to our economic divide. Harris, for instance, slammed tax cuts for the wealthy and big corporations three times while Trump remained mute on the subject. The former president’s most frequently uttered relevant word: “jobs.” In all but one of his seven “jobs” mentions, he was either attacking immigrants for stealing jobs from people of color or disputing the Biden-Harris administration’s job creation claims.
|
|
|
Presidential Debates and Taxing the Rich, Then and Now
The first televised U.S. presidential debate flashed onto America’s TV screens in 1960. The topics discussed? A look back at the event’s transcript shows that the evening’s proceedings included not a single word about a stunning domestic transformation then in its third decade. That transformation? The United States had become a much more economically equal nation, with top-bracket income tax rates running as high as 91 percent.
But what if that debate’s panel of journalists had asked the candidates to comment on the tax policies that had so powerfully fostered a much more equal America? Would that more equal America have had a better shot at surviving? Inequality.org co-editor Sam Pizzigati has more. |
PETULANT PLUTOCRAT OF THE WEEK |
A Distinctly Unhealthy Taste for the Finer Things in Life
This week’s dour deep pocket: Ralph de la Torre, the CEO of Steward Health Care, the for-profit hospital chain that filed for bankruptcy this past May amid charges from doctors and nurses that de la Torre and his private equity pals had been systematically shortchanging patient care.
What has de la Torre sour: a U.S. Senate health committee subpoena that required his presence at a September 12 hearing on Steward Health’s management decisions. De la Torre ignored that subpoena and had his lawyer blast the Senate inquiry as “a pseudo-criminal proceeding” designed “to convict Dr. de la Torre in the eyes of public opinion.”
Responded the chair of that Senate health panel, Vermont’s Bernie Sanders: Ralph de la Torre has become “the poster child” for the “outrageous corporate greed” permeating “our for-profit health care system.” He has become “obscenely wealthy” by loading up hospitals with billions in debt and selling the land underneath them to real estate execs who charge “unsustainably high rent.”
The last word: CEO de la Torre, observes the American Prospect, has siphoned out of Steward Health over a quarter-billion dollars and blown “most of it on an epic midlife crisis featuring a new wife 29 years his junior, a 500-acre ranch for her prizewinning racehorses, a $77,000-a-month detail for her security while traveling between the couple’s far-flung mansions,” and “not one but two yachts.”
|
|
|
What's new on Inequality.org
Chuck Collins, 801 U.S. billionaires hold a combined $6.22 trillion in wealth. The number of billionaires based in the United States has fallen slightly in recent months, but their wealth keeps growing unabated.
Manuel Pérez-Rocha, The UN Summit of the Future Appears Stuck in the Past. House Republicans are fixated on blocking corporate progress on clean energy, racial justice, and labor protections.
Elsewhere on the web
Sandra Laville, Superyacht and private jet tax could raise £2bn a year, say campaigners, The Guardian. Oxfam estimates that a levy would reduce emissions and raise urgently needed climate finance.
László Andor, After the Laffer curve: taxing the rich, at last, Social Europe. The time has come to jettison once and for all the claim that taxing the rich at higher rates reduces overall tax revenue.
Chuck Marr and Samantha Jacoby, Arguments Against Taxing Unrealized Capital Gains of Very Wealthy Fall Flat, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Insisting that unrealized gains can’t be “real” until cashed in amounts to insisting that Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk can’t be considered rich unless they sell their personal stock holdings.
Pat Garofalo, The Secret That’s Driving Up Highway Costs, Boondoggle. Public policy too often involves crippling the ability of government to do things well by undercutting government’s capacity to tax the richest among us.
Alina Wang, 20 Companies Where the Ratio of CEO to Average Worker Pay Is Insane, AOL. A hall of shame over recent years.
Judd Legum, The attack on the legitimacy of the 2024 presidential election has begun, Popular Information. The difference between the Trump 2020 and 2024 efforts to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the election process? This time, he has the public support of wealthy tech billionaires.
Carl Davis, Voucher Boondoggle: House Advances Plan to Give the Wealthy $1.20 for Every $1 They Steer to Private K-12 Schools, Just Taxes. The U.S. House Ways and Means Committee has just advanced legislation that would create an unprecedented tax incentive designed to bankroll private K-12 schools.
Heidi Shierholz, Trump’s claim that he would exempt overtime from taxes is deeply unserious, EPI Action. Donald Trump’s new claim that he would exempt overtime from taxes could hardly be more cynical. CEOs could actually become his proposal’s biggest beneficiaries.
Umber Khairi, In the Land of the Rich, The News on Sunday. Films and TV shows that feature luxury homes and spotlight the super rich serve to normalize obscene spending and extravagant lifestyles. |
|
|
ON BILLIONAIRES AND THE REST OF US |
This newsletter and the whole Inequality.org project are powered by donations. We’re not raking in cash from the billionaire class, though. We’re counting on people to see why this reporting, research, and advocacy matters, and then to become paid subscribers, by making a recurring monthly donation of any amount. Make a monthly gift as a paid subscriber. Start your paid subscription today. |
|
|
Inequality.org | www.inequality.org | inequality@ips-dc.org Institute for Policy Studies 1301 Connecticut Avenue Ste 600 Washington, DC 20036 United States
Managing Editor: Chris Mills Rodrigo Co-Editors: Sarah Anderson, Chuck Collins, Bella DeVaan, and Sam Pizzigati |
|
|
|